Original Investigation

Are Recommendations Followed after Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Questionnaire

10.4274/imj.galenos.2024.74484

  • Baran Demir
  • Nesrullah Azboy
  • Noor Rakkad
  • Melis Ayasgil
  • Bilgehan Çatal
  • İbrahim Azboy

Received Date: 21.12.2023 Accepted Date: 23.01.2024 İstanbul Med J 2024;25(1):31-35

Introduction:

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an operation that is successfully performed in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the compliance level of primary THA patients with their doctor’s post-operative advice on restricted hip movements and environment modifications to prevent dislocation.

Methods:

A survey consisting of 14 questions was prepared, questioning 320 patients who underwent THA in our clinic between 2015 and 2021. One hundred and forty three patients agreed to participate in our study, and their answers regarding whether they followed the introductions recommended by the surgeon who performed the surgery were recorded.

Results:

99% of the 143 patients who participated in the survey stated that they were given some advice. 46% (n=66) of the patients stated that they were told that these introductions should be applied for life. 60% of the patients did not cross their legs, 74% did not squat, 86% did not sit cross-legged, 76% did not use toilet risers, and 89% do not do unrecommended sports.

Conclusion:

Most patients complied with the surgeon’s recommendations in the early period; however, we observed that compliance decreased over time.

Keywords: Arthroplasty, dislocation, exercise, hip, motion, prosthesis, postoperative recommendations, recommendations, restriction

Introduction

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful option for patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis (1). Dislocation after arthroplasty is an important complication seen in 2-9% of patients (2). To prevent hip dislocation after THA, surgeons give some traditional recommendations. These recommendations include sitting high (with a cushion); avoiding sports such as running, jumping, cycling, and using a European toilet; and avoiding squatting and crossing legs while sitting (3,4).

In recent years, developments in hip prosthesis designs and surgical techniques, the use of larger heads, better definition and evaluation of hip-lumbar pathologies and their evaluation (5), and the introduction of modern implants aiming to reduce the risk of dislocation have reduced the risk of dislocation after THA (6). A clear consensus has not yet been made on whether conventional recommendations after THA are still necessary. The issue of whether patients comply with these recommendations has not been properly investigated (7). In addition, there is no clear data on the percentage of patients following these recommendations, whether the degree of compliance reduces the complication rates, or to what extent it affects the functions and quality of life of these patients.

In this study, we evaluated the compliance level of primary THA patients with their doctor’s post-operative advice on restricted hip movements and environment modifications.


Methods

A survey consisting of 14 questions was prepared (Table 1), questioning 320 patients who underwent THA in our clinic between 2015 and 2021 by phone. Of the 143 patients who agreed to participate in our study, their answers regarding whether they followed the introductions recommended by the surgeon who performed the surgery were recorded. All questions were multiple-choice.

Patients who underwent primary THA for primary degenerative coxarthrosis, femoral neck fractures, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head with a follow-up period of at least one year were included in the study.

Patients who underwent revision surgery for THA, those diagnosed with a connective tissue disorder, and those with developmental hip dysplasia were excluded. The patients were informed about the questionnaire, and their informed consent was obtained. Questions were asked to the patients by telephone interview. The responses were recorded.

The study protocol was approved by the İstanbul Medipol University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 18, date: 05.01.2023). This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical Analysis

To measure whether the data were normally distributed or not was analyzed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Normally distributed continuous variables are given as mean ± standard deviation, and non-normally distributed as median (minimum-maximum). The chi-square test was used to compare the categorical data of the binary groups. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The IBM SPSS version 25.0 (Chicago/Illinois, USA) data package program was used.


Results

99% of the 143 patients who participated in the survey stated that they were indeed given some recommendations after THA. 46% (n=66) of the patients stated that they were told that this recommendation should be applied lifelong, whereas 13% (n=19) stated that the recommendations were for three months. While 36% of the patients stated that they would apply the recommendations lifelong, we determined that 6% of the patients (n=9) never followed the recommendations. 73% of the patients in our study were women, and their mean age was 68.1±16.2 years (Table 2). The mean follow-up time of this study was 3,9 years, ranging from 1 to 7 years.

Two patients (nearly 1%) had a dislocation. One was due to acetabular aseptic loosening and polyethylene wear at the end of the second year postoperatively, and the other was a periprosthetic fracture dislocation due to falling accidentally one month after the operation. Both were operated on after a femoral neck fracture. They agreed that doctors gave them advice, and they stated advice was for 6 months and lifelong, respectively. In addition, the former took the advice accordingly and the latter one for 1 year only.

When asked about the activities, the most frequently avoided activity by the patients was cycling (91%), followed by unrecommended sports (89%) Crossing their legs (60%) and squatting (74%). It was observed that 9% of the patients continued to perform squats and 6% performed cross-legged movements contrary to recommendations. 76% of the patients did not use WC risers, whereas 14% continued to use oriental toilets.

It was found that 63% of women in our study never crossed their legs, whereas this rate was 54% in men (p=0.017) (Table 3). In addition, the percentage of women avoiding squatting (80%) was significantly higher than that of men (59%) (p=0.022). Furthermore, the frequency of women never driving was 11%, in contrast, this rate was 18% in men (p=0.001). Likewise, women were slightly more compatible compared to men about not running, 84% to 72%, respectively (p=0.007).


Discussion

This study demonstrated that almost all orthopedic surgeons (99%) give some recommendations to their patients to reduce the risk of dislocations after THA. Similarly, patients acknowledge that they have been given advice regarding physical activity restrictions. While most physicians made these recommendations for life-long implementation, only 39 (n=56) of patients adhered to them for relatively short periods, between 3 months and 1 year. It can be argued that patients tend to stop applying these recommendations.

The effect of recommendations to prevent dislocation is not adequately investigated. A review conducted in 2015 to investigate the effect of different patient restriction protocols on dislocation in primary THA stated that the follow-up period was between 6 months and 2 years. They analyzed studies including patients with a variable range of restriction protocols, stating that crossing legs and extreme hip flexion were the most common restrictions. They found a 1.5% dislocation rate in the restricted group and 1% in the unrestricted group. Their conclusion was that more liberal protocols would not increase dislocation rates (8). Accordingly, Peak et al. (9) studied the role of additional patient restrictions besides the range of hip motion (restriction of above 90 degrees flexion, adduction (crossing the legs), and internal and external rotation above 45 degrees, for all patients) on early dislocation following THA in a randomized, prospective study with the same follow-up time. This study had only 1 (0.3%) dislocation case overall, which occurred when the patient was transferred from the operating table to the patient bed. The patient belonged to the restricted group and had no operation for instability afterward (9). Both studies reported that the dislocation rate did not increase in the unrestricted patient group. Additionally, the time to return to work and daily activities was shorter in unrestricted patients. However, while the latter study stated that the patients followed in a strict manner, the former study did not specify if the patients followed the restrictions imposed on them adequately. Future studies with longer observation periods, including patient groups with different protocols, would help to determine the role of physician’s advice in long-term dislocation rates. Two patients (2%) experienced dislocation in our study, one after 3 weeks and the other 11 months after surgery. Both patients received recommendations from their surgeons and implemented the advice accordingly by 6 and 12 months. The dislocation rate in the present study was similar to previous studies in the literature (10,11). Nonetheless, more patients with hip dislocation were required to analyze the effect of recommendations given after THA.

Most patients followed the recommendations for squatting or sitting cross-legged less frequently, whereas more patients followed the modifications we recommend at home, such as using a seat cushion and a toilet lift. The fact that these movements are relatively simple and more necessary in daily life by patients can be considered as the reason for this situation. On the other hand, there are various studies showing that these recommendations are unnecessary in addition to fundamental restrictions such as adduction, hyperflexion, and rotation above 45 degrees (9,12-14).

Although dislocation remains a crucial complication after THA, there are several surgical precautions (12). Appropriate surgical technique and implant selection and proper placement of components have an critical role in preventing this complication (15). In addition, during the postoperative period, patients’ compliance with exercise and recommendations also plays an important role (7,10,16). Furthermore, we argue that modified recommendations by surgeons according to the patients and explaining them clearly would improve patient satisfaction by increasing compliance with the recommendations and reducing the risk of complications.

It was determined that compliance with the recommendations related to sports was the highest. The probable reason for this was that most of the patients were individuals with a relatively high body mass index (the mean number was approximately 31 kg/m2) and a sedentary lifestyle (stated by patients during the interview) before the operation belonged to the elderly population. Considering that these individuals are patients who had tried conservative treatment for a long time before surgery and did not benefit from it, persistent pain that reduces the quality of life can be counted as the reason for staying away from sports (17,18).

This study has shown that women’s compliance rates with advice such as crossing legs, squatting, and driving were significantly higher than men’s. They were similar in other aspects. A review of literature conducted by Rowan et al. (16) found no difference in the rate of dislocation between women and men. However, we realize that former studies about patient compliance to recommendations after surgery did not investigate the difference between genders (19-21). Nonetheless, as an example, different studies inspecting national data from the USA and Lithuania with numbers of 1,610,155 and 3403 primary THA patients showed that male gender can be a risk factor for dislocation, especially at earlier post-operative period (22,23). We argue that male inattentiveness could be a factor in this difference in genders.

Study Limitations

Among the limitations of this study, it has shown that a large proportion of the patients did not answer the phone call or did not accept to participate in the survey (55%) (n=177). Due to the nature of the questionnaire, the patients and their relatives may have problems remembering past times; therefore, patient-based bias may have affected the results of this study. The questions asked in the questionnaire were created on the basis of the recommendations of our own clinic. Although there are studies comparing the effect of different restriction protocols on dislocation rates, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the standardization of recommendations after arthroplasty. There is a need for an algorithm in which the results of similar studies can be compared as a reference. Moreover, studies with larger complicated patient series are needed to investigate the effects of recommendations on reducing the risk of dislocation and prosthesis survival.


Conclusion

This study showed that almost all surgeons give some recommendations to reduce the risk of dislocation after THA. Most patients complied with these recommendations in the early period; however, we observed that compliance decreased over time. Lifelong recommendations may be unnecessary. Moreover, women were more willing than men to comply with the recommendations.

Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was approved by the İstanbul Medipol University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 18, date: 05.01.2023).

Informed Consent: Their informed consent was obtained.

Authorship Contributions: Surgical and Medical Practices - B.Ç., İ.A.; Concept - B.D., N.R., İ.A.; Design - B.D., M.A., B.Ç.; Data Collection or Processing - N.A., N.R., M.A.; Analysis or Interpretation - B.D., N.A., B.Ç.; Literature Search - N.R., M.A.; Writing - B.D., N.A., İ.A.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.


Images

  1. Shan L, Shan B, Suzuki A, Nouh F, Saxena A. Intermediate and long-term quality of life after total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97: 156-68.
  2. Guo L, Yang Y, An B, Yang Y, Shi L, Han X, et al. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2017; 38: 123-9.
  3. Total Knee Replacement, American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons https://hipknee.aahks.org/total-knee-replacement/, Accessed December 8, 2015
  4. Meester SB, Wagenmakers R, van den Akker-Scheek I, Stevens M. Sport advice given by Dutch orthopaedic surgeons to patients after a total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0202494.
  5. Heckmann N, McKnight B, Stefl M, Trasolini NA, Ike H, Dorr LD. Late Dislocation Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Spinopelvic Imbalance as a Causative Factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100: 1845-53.
  6. Darrith B, Courtney PM, Della Valle CJ. Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J 2018; 100: 11-9.
  7. Fortier LM, Rockov ZA, Chen AF, Rajaee SS. Activity Recommendations After Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103: 446-55.
  8. van der Weegen W, Kornuijt A, Das D. Do lifestyle restrictions and precautions prevent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2016; 30: 329-39.
  9. Peak EL, Parvizi J, Ciminiello M, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, et al. The role of patient restrictions in reducing the prevalence of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 247-53.
  10. Parvizi J, Picinic E, Sharkey PF. Revision total hip arthroplasty for instability: surgical techniques and principles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 1134-42.
  11. Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 2456-63.
  12. Crompton J, Osagie-Clouard L, Patel A. Do hip precautions after posterior-approach total hip arthroplasty affect dislocation rates? A systematic review of 7 studies with 6,900 patients. Acta Orthop 2020; 91: 687-92.
  13. Reimert J, Lockwood KJ, Hau R, Taylor NF. Are hip movement precautions effective in preventing prosthesis dislocation post hip arthroplasty using a posterior surgical approach? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 2560-6.
  14. Crompton J, Osagie-Clouard L, Patel A. Do hip precautions after posterior-approach total hip arthroplasty affect dislocation rates? A systematic review of 7 studies with 6,900 patients. Acta Orthop 2020; 91: 687-92.
  15. Saiz AM, Lum ZC, Pereira GC. Etiology, Evaluation, and Management of Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. JBJS Rev 2019; 7: e7.
  16. Rowan FE, Benjamin B, Pietrak JR, Haddad FS. Prevention of Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33: 1316-24.
  17. Murphy NJ, Eyles JP, Hunter DJ. Hip Osteoarthritis: Etiopathogenesis and Implications for Management. Adv Ther 2016; 33: 1921-46.
  18. Jiang L, Rong J, Wang Y, Hu F, Bao C, Li X, et al. The relationship between body mass index and hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Joint Bone Spine 2011; 78: 150-5.
  19. Tsang B, McDonald D, McNamara I, Kottam L, Rangan A, Baker P. National survey of occupational advice for lower limb arthroplasty patients. Occup Med (Lond) 2020; 70: 123-6.
  20. Patel PV, Giannoudis VP, Palma S, Guy SP, Palan J, Pandit H, et al. Doctor when can I drive? A systematic review and meta-analysis of return to driving after total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2023; 33: 17-27.
  21. Nouri F, Coole C, Baker P, Drummond A. Return to driving after total hip and knee arthroplasty - the perspective of employed patients. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44: 7811-7.
  22. Mohamed NS, Castrodad IMD, Etcheson JI, Sodhi N, Remily EA, Wilkie WA, et al. Inpatient dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: incidence and associated patient and hospital factors. Hip Int 2022; 32: 152-9.
  23. Masionis P, Vileikis TP, Kvederas G, Uvarovas V, Šatkauskas I, Sveikata T, et al. Risk Factors for Revision After Early and Delayed Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation. An Analysis of Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register. Cureus 2021; 13: e14155.